If you look at the mortgage delinquency rate, I think it is very difficult to expect an economic recovery in 2010. This is from an AP article posted in the Houston Chronicle this morning.

More than 14 percent of American homeowners with a mortgage were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of September, a record-high for the ninth straight quarter and a problem that could threaten the economic recovery.

So picture a room of 50 mortgagors. 7 people in the room are either in payment default or are so far behind that the bank holding the loan has exercised the remedy of foreclosure.

The record-high foreclosure numbers are being driven by borrowers with traditional fixed-rate mortgages, rather than the shady subprime loans with adjustable rates that kicked off the mortgage crisis.

Prime traditional fixed-rate mortgages are now a larger problem than the subprime loans. The subprime loans could potentially be worked out into a long term fixed rate loan giving room to reduce the monthly payment. But in the case of a fixed-rate loan, there isn’t much that can be done. These mortgagors simply cannot afford their houses.

 

Loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration also show increasing signs of trouble. More than 18 percent of FHA borrowers are at least one payment behind or in foreclosure.

I wrote about the FHA last week. If you take a room of 50 people with FHA loans, 9 people in the room would be in payment default on their loans. Trader Mark at Fund My Mutual Fund also has some good posts about the problem with incentives that provide homeowners upside benefits without downside risk.

People know about the housing crisis. But I don’t think they realize how bad it actually is. How is there going to be an economic recovery when 14-18% of all mortgagors are in default. If you can’t afford your home, it means you have no discretionary income. You’re concentrating on putting food on your table.

Now picture that same group of 50 people. We know that 7-9 of them have absolutely no money to spend. How many others are barely making ends meet? I think we can easily say that at least 20% of mortgagors are not in a position to participate in the economy. I suspect the number is substantially higher but 20% is staggering enough.

Of course, I’m just talking about homeowners with mortgages. Historically, renters are generally in a worse position financially than homeowners with mortgages. So if homeowners are having trouble participating in the economy, the situation for renters is likely worse.

My opinion is that we’ll be working through this housing crisis for years. The expectation of being able to unwind this in a matter of months or even within a year is simply not a reasonable expectation.

long_term_spy

I have not posted this long term double top chart in a long time. I have not forgotten about it.

dmm_001

Finally, for those that believe we’re still in the early innings of the housing crisis, DMM is worth a look. It has been in an uptrend since September. It is very thinly traded so it really needs to be a long term holding and limit orders must be used to enter.

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Foreclosure, Mortgage, Subprime lending at Wikinvest
  • rosocecasita
    The 1 month, 3 month treasuries went negative? According to Zero Hedge that is.

    I updated the links page to include Advancing / Declining issues on NYSE & Nasdaq

    Also has Treasuries now.
  • I just noticed the drop on the treasuries when I looked at the TED spread. The TED spread is up but it is not because there is an uptick in interest rates. LIBOR has actually been ticking down a bit. However, the yield on short term treasuries (1 and 3 month) is near 0. So basically, to calculate the TED spread you just use 3 month LIBOR since short term treasuries are at 0.

    I suppose this is evidence of deflation and/or major risk aversion as money is willing to take a 0% yield in exchange for the safety of being in treasuries. Perhaps it also means money wants flexibility instead of being stuck in longer term treasuries that might lose value (so perhaps that is an argument for inflation expectations).

    I don't know the right conclusion. But to me it sounds like price instability and risk aversion which doesn't seem like a good sign for the stock market.
  • rosocecasita
    Exactly, someone is willing to pay money via negative yield to go from cash to treasury, that doesn't even make sense in my head!

    If your already in cash, wouldn't it be better NOT to buy a negative yield treasury?

    I mean, your paying money to keep your cash, in a cash equivalent vehicle right?
  • Well, if you believe cash is providing a negative rate of return than a 0 or slightly negative return might actually be a good return. Or, if you're afraid to keep money in a bank or in a money market fund the short term treasury might have appeal. As you go up the curve, you take on risk that the bonds will go down in value if you want to sell.
  • rosocecasita
    So, to get a negative ror on cash, inflation must be high/ dollar losing value, check.

    But if you get 0 or less yield, that is subtracting further from your losing value?

    I mean, your subtracting profit from a negative/losing position at zero or below ? So your willing to pay for protection?

    There can only be one kind of protection, FDIC only insures 250K, so if you have way more then that in any institution, the only piece of paper that has that kind of guarantee is treasury bills right?

    I can only see one condition to purchasing negative yield Treasury bonds: If your cash *it self* is at risk? Otherwise you could just be in cash, with no other exposure.
  • tony61
    "So picture a room of 50 homeowners. 7 people in the room..."

    Not to nitpick, but it's "homeowners with a mortgage"... nearly half do not have a mortgage.

    I happen to agree with the conclusion of the article, just trying to be accurate.
  • Good catch. I'll make the correction. Thank you.
  • I've written about this recently, but Zerohedge has a post about the danger of the short dollar trade and how all assets are in one big bucket. The biggest takeaway is to realize it is almost impossible to diversify your portfolio right now.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/goldman-dollar...
  • The USA government keeps borrowing from China, Japan, et. al. to prop up the housing market, conduct wars, and stimulate the economy in general by running these budget deficits. Even incentives (e.g. Cash for Clunkers, Cash for Whatever, New Homebuyers Credit) reduce tax revenues and the money must be borrowed from the rest of the world. Both Republicans & Democrats have done this, so throwing the rascals out of Congress hasn't changed anything because they can't cut the budget. Any major budget cut affects too big a constituency. I honestly don't see an effective solution to this. USA creditors will eventually make the decision as to when it is enough, then the market will work all these problems out of the economy. It won't be a pretty sight...
  • I unfortunately agree with you. I always think it is worth not giving up but I tend to believe we are way past the point of no return.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Disclaimer: This blog does not and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Any commentary used on this page is for purposes of discussion only. You should not construe anything on Charts and Coffee as recommendations to buy or sell securities and you should not construe anything on this page as legal, tax, investment, financial or any other type of advice. Nothing contained on this page constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, promotion, endorsement, encouragement or offer to buy or sell (whether it is securities or otherwise) by Charts and Coffee, its owners, representatives or agents.